|
Author
|
Topic: Sandpiper motor size
|
Ken Member
|
posted January 27, 2004 10:24 AM
IMHO 4 hp is not enough to drive a Sandpiper through bigger waves and winds that you might encounter when rounding a protected point or when you just need to give up sailing and get to a safe port. The Johnson "Sailmaster" longshaft on ShortWave has a finer pitched propeller to give you good low speed thrust while keeping the motor's rpms in the best torque range. It also has a 6 amp alternator. The greater weight compared to a smaller engine has not been an issue on the dual spring transom motor mount. Smaller motors may have an integral fuel tank. They're hard to refill on a moving vessel. I have two plastic tanks in the lazarette. It's easy to move the fuel line connector from one to another. I get around 12-14 hours on a tank at 4 kts. We found that out while motoring in no wind conditions on a long day's leg from Frenchman's Bay to Coberg. Personally, I'd feel uncomfortable with anything smaller than 6 hp on Lake Ontario or Georgian Bay.
IP: 141.117.228.117 |
Eric Member
|
posted January 27, 2004 12:14 PM
Exactly!I've been following a thread on the TrailerSailor BB re the same sort of issue! The discussion is whether a smaller hp motor with a High Thrust prop is "equivelent" to a motor of slightly higher HP with a regular prop. A poster is concerned about excessive weight, with a bigger engine. I don't think a HT prop will add any more power in the long run, maybe quicker of the line, but eventually a higher HP motor will prevail, especially in conditions Ken speaks of. My comment on all of this was the need to know resistance,(waves, current, headwind etc). As Ken pointed out, conditions can be heavier on the Great Lakes, as compared to my usual sailing on inland Lake Simcoe. I have a Merc 4.5hp longshaft, and it has proven to be quite satisfactory for me...on my lake! I personally don't think you'd need much bigger on a smaller lake, because currents, waves etc are lighter than on large lakes. I haven't had my Sandpiper out in any rough stuff on the Great Lakes yet, but I hope to this summer! To summarize, I feel it would be difficult to characterize that a sailboat requires a certain sized motor and be done with it. I really feel that there could be choices dependeing on your sailing waters. 2hp could be adequate in a lot of conditions to propel the Sandpiper, but be useless in steep waves, current and wind on a large body of water, where greater hp is required to overcome the increased resistance! By the way, Ken, did you ever cross Lake Ontario from Toronto to St.Catharines/Niagara in Shortwave? If no, would you? Cheers Eric [This message has been edited by Eric (edited January 27, 2004).] [This message has been edited by Eric (edited January 27, 2004).] [This message has been edited by Eric (edited January 27, 2004).] IP: 130.63.85.93 |
Celtic Kiss unregistered
|
posted January 27, 2004 12:39 PM
I too agree that the Sandpiper should carry at least a 6 hp in places like the Great Lakes or coastal areas. When I was young and living in Halifax I was out sailing at the mouth of the harbour with my father and his brother in a 26 ft wooden boat. We noticed that time was running out on us so it was decided to crank up the 6 hp Johnson. In short the motor was labouring quite a bit to counter the wind and waves coming off Chedabucto Head. My uncle noted that we could've used a 10 hp that day.A few years ago when I was sunk by a J 24 we were hauled aboard the offending boat and powered back to shore. The san Juan 21 i was crewing on sank. To my dismay they only carried a 3 hp which was fine for going downwind but as soon as they tried to point into the wind, the motor became useless. I as completely enraged with their stupidity. I also saw a similar scenario in Bronton Ont. a few years ago. Underpowered and nearly washed into the seawall. Oddly enough it was also a J 24. My theory: Be prepared for the worst and hope for the best. ------------------ Robert Celtic Kiss #2120 IP: 142.59.51.255 |
Darcy Member
|
posted January 27, 2004 03:59 PM
Some of the keen racers use the lightest motor possible to keep weight out of the stern area. But it just takes one line squall throwing your boat up on the rocks to bring you back to your senses.Having sailed through 60 knot winds on Lakes Simcoe & Rosseau, I'd advise going with 6 h.p. there as well. That short chop developed on a shallow lake like Simcoe can pound a boat just as well as Lake Ontario or the Pacific. No matter what motor you go with it should also be a long shaft (in my opinion). D'Arcy IP: 64.229.228.35 |
Hyprstitch Member
|
posted January 28, 2004 12:28 AM
Hello Darcy, The new motors are so big that I went with a short shaft. The 20" shaft with the motor up would be a foot into the water. I bought a 2003 Suzuki 4 stroke. Works real will on my Sandpiper.
IP: 152.163.253.101 |
Eric Member
|
posted January 28, 2004 02:54 PM
Ken, a follow up to my post above(kind of getting of the topic), but I wondered in your opinion, if a Sandpiper, with 2 experienced sailing crew, with adequate safety equipment etc, could meet the challenges of crossing Lake Ontario? It is said that the Sandpiper was designed for the English Channel. I've only crossed the lake once, from Bronte to the Welland Canal, and that was on a 44' C&C! There was a good strong springtime wind, and we sailed across on a single starboard tack, on a reach with the rail down! Personally, I feel that it can be done, but I was wondering what your thoughts and experiences are? Thanks, Eric
IP: 130.63.85.93 |
Ken Member
|
posted January 28, 2004 05:35 PM
Eric, the short answer is YES. Toronto to Niagara on a Sandpiper is possible. But not with me in it!At the usual sailing speeds (on a reach in a decent breeze) of 3 - 3.5 kts it would take too long for me to be comfortable with this trip. It would possibly be in excess of 9 hours across, assuming a direct course and favourable winds and seas (unlikely). Given the prevailing south westerlies around here, the wind might be right on the nose going over, making tacking necessary. Tacking takes you away from the rhumb line. Coming home might be less wind, more wind, or the wrong wind. A long trip if you're running. I wouldn't hesitate to take a Sandpiper around the edge 'tho. In 2002 we sailed from Humber Bay to Lakeshore Yacht Club, Port Credit, Oakville and then Bronte Yacht Club. We had great conditions mostly, but did encounter two squalls with rain and heavy winds that drove us off the lake and into yacht clubs on two consecutive days. The heavy weather comes up really fast on those hot summer afternoons. I'd not wish to be mid-lake on any 18 foot vessel! If time had permitted on that trip, we would have continued to LaSalle Park marina on Burlington Bay, and then along the shore past Grimsby toward Port Dalhousie. On our trip to Prince Edward County and Picton on Lake Ontario in 2002 we were never more than three miles offshore in the Sandpiper. Some of the waves and wind conditions that we encountered while returning past Port Hope caused us to go ashore for the night after making headway while motorsailing of only 1 nautical mile in one hour. Some fishermen were in sight the whole time and we were never able to catch up to them....and they were only motoring at trolling speeds! IP: 141.117.228.117 |
Celtic Kiss unregistered
|
posted January 28, 2004 08:44 PM
I also agree that a SandPiper could make an easy crossing of from Toronto to Niagra. I'd even do the trip solo. All you need really is a good weather window and to be prepared for all contingencies. With a good weather window I'd even try it in a Hobie 16 or 18. ------------------ Robert Celtic Kiss #2120 IP: 142.59.51.255 |
Eric Member
|
posted January 29, 2004 06:59 AM
Ken: LOL, you're getting soft on that Niagara eh!! Look at Robert there going by in the CL16! not much more comfort than a Sandpiper, except for the cabin, LOL.  I figured roughly, that it would be 8-10hr sailing. That's a long time holding a tiller!! I fully agree though, by the time I tie up at Port Dalhousie, I/we? would be very tired. The pubs better still be open 'cause a cold one, two or three will definately be in order followed by a long snooze! I just think it would be a neat trip to test endurance etc. Not something I'd want to do regularly! I appreciate your thoughts. Thanks. Eric IP: 130.63.85.93 |
whited unregistered
|
posted January 29, 2004 08:10 AM
That Robert is a 'wild one'. If he's crazy enough to sail a CL 16 on the North Atlantic..he's up for anything!For 'normal sailors, I might try it on a safe day but would need at least one other person to take turns at the tiller. I find the 7.5 hour trips between our 'summer club' in St. Margaret's Bay to our regular club at the Royal NS Yacht Squadron a bit tedious.....and we had beautiful scenery to watch. IP: 142.177.19.146 |
elmet3 unregistered
|
posted January 29, 2004 01:02 PM
I often sail single handed. I have built a quick-release clamp that attaches to the tiller and grabs a line strung across the stern end of the cockpit, holding the tiller in place. Of course you could tie the tiller down, but the clamp allows me to instantly lock or unlock the tiller just by squeezing the release lever, which is placed so that grabing the tiller will also release the tiller. I can also adjust the strength of the clamp to allow me to force the tiller over without actually unlocking it, although this would only save me milliseconds because the release lever does the job instantly. Still, it's a design feature I incorporated for emergencies. For normal operation I just release all clamp pressure and the tiller moves normally without me holding the release lever. Using this device, I often lock the tiller and sail several minutes. It gives me time to go forward, check the map, get my hat from the cabin, adjust the keel, tighten the halyard, etc. I couldn't sail without it. I don't know how long the boat would behave with the tiller tied down like this, I suppose it depends upon the conditions. I don't sail water big enough to really test how long it would stay on course. But, if I were crossing a Great Lake, alone or otherwise, I would use it extensively to relieve the tedium and fatigue. If you are out sailing for 9 hours fatigue is a big concern.
IP: 67.107.33.106 |
Ken Member
|
posted January 29, 2004 02:45 PM
Like I said, go ahead and sail/motor a Cl-16, Hobie cat or a Sandpiper across Lake Ontario; but i'll not be onboard. The Wx window is either too short, or there won't be any wind (or the wrong wind) and 8-10 hours of tiller tending on the same course would be tiring and mind dulling. If done on a weekend, then there's the "Gotta leave today 'cause we gotta go to work tomorrow" syndrome. We always leave a day or two "for the lake"......setting out in big water on some kind of land-based timetable is never a great idea.IP: 141.117.228.117 |
Darcy Member
|
posted January 30, 2004 01:11 PM
We did a crossing two years ago from Toronto to Niagara on the Lake. We left at 4:00 A.M. in very light wind and arrived 12 hours later.Light wind can be as trickey as the heavy stuff. Two times during the night we had to motor out of the way of freighters as our speed under sail was not fast enough to clear their paths. You really have to keep a sharp eye. A freighter steaming at full speed can be on you in no time! We did watches - two to a watch (in case someone fell over board). I wouldn't want to do it alone. I also make sure I'm connected with a person overboard harness. The odds of you being recovered after falling in are greatly reduced. First fundimental rule of sailing: Don't fall overboard. The up side: One of the most beautiful sun rises I've ever seen. D'Arcy IP: 64.229.226.97 |
Hyprstitch Member
|
posted January 30, 2004 11:20 PM
Hello Darcy, Sailing mountian lakes here in Colorado is also tricky. The wind os always shifting and Gusting. And also great sunrise and sunsets. I enjoy having the only Sandpiper on the Lakes. Sid IP: 152.163.253.101 |
Darcy Member
|
posted February 01, 2004 09:04 PM
Hyprstitch:I'm familiar with those mountain lakes. I used to sail occasionally in the Okanagan. In the afternoon powerful thermal gusts would come shooting down the hills and onto the lake. All we could see was black water moving at us then wham!!! Over we'd go. On that note; a real terrifying sail for me is when you're night sailing through squalls or heavy weather. It's very hard reading the gusts and rolling waves at night. In my opinion a smaller body of water like Lake Ontario is harder as the waves are short and steep. It really batters the boat. I encountered some heavy weather sailing around the Swiftsure light off of Vancouver Island. Although the waves were huge (15 foot rollers or so) at least your're not pounding as much. you can work your way up and down them. It's sort of like skiing only the moguls are moving. D'Arcy IP: 64.229.220.201 |
Hyprstitch Member
|
posted February 01, 2004 10:56 PM
Hello Darcy, I've never sailed at night. Look forward to it one day. Many of the lakes here are closed down at sunset. And about the biggest wave I've encountered is about 3 foot. I signed up for a costal navigation course that starts this Tuesday. 10 week course. Sid IP: 152.163.253.101 |
CL Staff Administrator
|
posted February 02, 2004 02:09 PM
Hey guys,I've done the lake in a hobie 18, best time of my life... fast, wet and rough. I think I saw a movie like that once... Keep talking, ~~~~~_/)~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~_/)~~~~ ------------------ Cody Sailing Advisor/Sales manager/Web Development CL SAILBOATS codyc@clsailboats.com IP: 209.5.232.10 | |